Results

How LeanFM helped The Andy Warhol Museum uncover BAS logic faults and reduce utility spend by more than $100K per year.

The issues were already in the building data. LeanFM found the patterns, helped prioritize action, and the corrected faults produced measurable savings.

  • Hidden faults surfaced from existing building data
  • Clear findings tied to operational impact
  • Actionable next steps for facilities teams

Building data to findings

1

Existing data

2

Hidden faults

3

Clear action

Case study signal

Logic fault correctedVisible in data
Reported savingsWarhol case study
Operational impactReduced utility use

Proof That Hidden Issues Are Already in the Data

Many building system problems do not appear as obvious alarms. LeanFM looks for patterns across system data to help teams identify what is wasting energy, affecting comfort, or creating unnecessary system strain.

The goal is not more data. The goal is clearer action.

Primary proof point

Featured Case Study: The Andy Warhol Museum

The seven-floor mixed-use museum required stable temperature and humidity control for sensitive artwork, visitor comfort, and staff comfort.

Project Details

Owner

Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh

Location

Pittsburgh, PA

Size

88,000 sq ft

Duration

2023-ongoing

Challenge

After a new BAS was installed in 2021, the museum still needed to reduce HVAC energy waste, improve comfort, protect artwork, support sustainability, and extend equipment life. LeanFM analysis in 2022 found BAS logic faults that were corrected.

What LeanFM Found

The museum had already invested in a BAS. The opportunity was not more hardware. It was finding the hidden logic faults and operating patterns the system was not surfacing clearly enough.

Case Study Results

$56,386

Reported first-year savings

$101,383

Reported second-year savings

$100K+

Ongoing annual savings shown in the case study

  • Reduced chilled water and steam usage over time
  • Reported savings based on the provided case study
  • Corrected logic faults that were already visible in the data

The important point is not just the savings—it is that correctable logic faults were already visible in the data.

Results are from this specific case study. Actual outcomes depend on building conditions, available data, and corrective actions taken.

Trend-style view

Reduced utility usage over time

Chilled waterBefore correction
Chilled waterFirst year
Chilled waterSecond year
SteamBefore correction
SteamFirst year
SteamSecond year

What This Proves

New systems can still hide problems

The Warhol had a newer BAS, but LeanFM still found logic faults affecting performance.

Existing data can reveal missed issues

The value was already in the building data. LeanFM helped surface what mattered.

Small operational issues can create large impact

Correcting hidden faults helped reduce waste and improve operational performance.

Sensitive environments benefit from early detection

Museums need consistency, not just reactive alarms.

Examples of Issues LeanFM Has Identified

Across complex buildings, LeanFM has identified recurring patterns that traditional alarm workflows can miss.

Additional historical examples from complex facilities include:

Historical example

Healthcare facility example

Hospital buildings with Trane BAS

  • 39 biased temperature and pressure sensors
  • Overcooling followed by reheat
  • CO2 sensors not fully utilized
  • Short-term energy reduction reported in the historical case material

Historical example

Large hospital campus example

1.4M sq ft across 4 buildings with JCI BAS

  • Software and hardware faults in AHUs and VAVs
  • 9.7-14.4% energy waste identified
  • Weekly coordination with facilities and HVAC teams
  • Issues reviewed with facility manager, HVAC managers, and technicians

Historical example

Resort and casino example

270K sq ft hospitality facility with Siemens BAS

  • 11 days of BAS data analyzed
  • $12,000/month in energy waste diagnosed
  • Leaking cooling valves and biased temperature sensors identified
  • Manual control logic, economizer settings, and overcooling issues found

Historical example

Large office building example

550K sq ft office facility with Honeywell BAS

  • 13 days of data analyzed
  • Incorrectly installed relays identified
  • Unused BAS sensors found in control programs
  • Frequent VFD resets found

The Same Hidden Problems Show Up Across Building Types

Sensor drift

Simultaneous heating and cooling

Overcooling and reheat

BAS logic faults

Equipment running unnecessarily

Control sequence issues

Underused sensors

Unnecessary equipment strain

Every Building Is Different

LeanFM does not promise a fixed savings percentage because every building is different. Results depend on system configuration, available data, operating conditions, and which corrective actions are taken.

But the pattern is consistent: hidden issues often exist in the data before they are obvious in the building.

Start With a Sample Analysis

1

Share existing building system data

2

LeanFM analyzes for hidden issues

3

Review prioritized findings

4

Decide what to address first

Built From Real Building Data

Findings tied to actual system behavior

Prioritized issues facilities teams can review

Evidence-based recommendations, not generic advice

See What Your Building Data Can Reveal

Send the data you already have. LeanFM will help identify hidden issues affecting energy, comfort, and system performance.

Request a Sample Analysis