Representative of real deployments, this example shows the AIR summary, findings ranked by dollar impact, trend evidence, and identified-versus-captured reporting. Three pages are below—the full PDF is one email away.
Illustrative visualization. The representative report pages below show the actual reporting structure: scores, findings, trend evidence, and identified-versus-captured status.
LeanFM analysis report · page 1 of 12 · building anonymized
74
AIR score · out of 100 · this analysis run
Every rating above is expanded in the pages that follow — each with its findings, the trend evidence, and the estimated annual impact.
LeanFM analysis report · page 3 of 12
| # | Finding | Equipment | Est. annual impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Simultaneous heating and cooling, weekday occupied hours | RTU-2 | $18,400 |
| 02 | Economizer at minimum position through free-cooling weather | AHU-1 | $11,900 |
| 03 | Occupied schedule running 4am and weekends, space unoccupied | VAV-2-08 | $6,200 |
| 04 | Discharge-air reset disabled after a sequence change | AHU-2 | $4,100 |
| 05 | Chilled-water pumps staging early against false demand | CHW plant | $3,800 |
Each finding includes the trend evidence, root-cause diagnosis, recommended fix, and the effort level — most of the top five here are schedule and sequence changes, not capital work. Figures are representative of real deployments.
LeanFM analysis report · page 11 of 12
We report identified savings and captured savings separately — the line only moves when a fix is verified in the data. If a number is still an estimate, the report says so. That separation is the whole point — you see what's real, not what's hoped for.
Want this for your building? Request a free sample analysis